Wet get drier (eventually)?

A prevailing paradigm of how rainfall patterns will change on a warming Earth is that the hydrological cycle strengthens causing wet regions to get wetter and dry regions to get drier.

However, this is not always the case: Hawkins, Joshi & Frame (2014) highlight one particular effect – the movement of the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) – as a key long-term driver of rainfall changes that do not follow this ‘wet get wetter’ paradigm.

[Update 30/07/14: Two comments below rightly point out that the 'wet get wetter' paradigm is understood to be an oversimplification of what is expected, especially over land regions.]

The ITCZ is a band of clouds & rain found near the equator. It moves north & south during the seasons, following the Sun’s zenith, but is also projected to move more permanently as the planet warms.

Our key new finding is that, if you warm the planet for long enough, this ITCZ band will move over some regions (making them wetter) and eventually past them (making them drier again). This is like a very slow moving weather front.

Figure 1 below shows projected summer precipitation in five GCMs from 1860-2300 using historical & RCP8.5 emissions for a region in South America (80W-65W), compared with a climatological estimate from GPCP.

Some GCMs (especially those with higher spatial resolution) demonstrate this ‘wetter then drier’ signal for this particular region as the ITCZ slowly moves southwards. However, there is considerable model uncertainty in the projected response as other GCMs do not show this effect. Note also that just using an ensemble mean would likely not reveal this signal.

Figure 2 shows the precipitation timeseries for 5°N highlighting the ‘wetter then drier’ effect for a single location. The projected rainfall changes are seen to be ‘non-monotonic’, with implications for planning for a changing climate, i.e. should decisions be made assuming a wetter or drier future? Projected temperatures continue to increase in this region in all cases.

Finally, we note that economic models of climate change assume quite simple and constant relationships between rainfall and temperature. This research demonstrates the limits of these assumptions.

Figure 1: summer (JJA) precipitation projections (decadally smoothed) from five GCMs from 1860-2300 under RCP8.5, and the observed climatology from GPCP.

Figure 2: Timeseries of JJA precipitation projections (decadally smoothed) at 5°N & averaged over 80W-65W.

Hawkins, E., Joshi, M., & Frame, D. (2014). Wetter then drier in some tropical areas Nature Climate Change, 4 (8), 646-647 DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2299

About Ed Hawkins

Ed Hawkins (twitter: @ed_hawkins) is a climate scientist in NCAS-Climate at the Department of Meteorology, University of Reading. His research interests are in decadal variability and predictability of climate, especially in the Atlantic region, and in quantifying the different sources of uncertainty in climate predictions and impacts. Ed is a Contributing Author to IPCC AR5 and a member of the CLIVAR Scientific Steering Group.
This entry was posted in GCMs, precipitation, projections, uncertainty. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Wet get drier (eventually)?

  1. Mat Collins says:

    Here’s the relevant para from Chapter 12 IPCC AR5

    To analyze the patterns of projected precipitation changes, a useful
    framework consists in decomposing them into a part that is related to
    atmospheric circulation changes and a part that is related mostly to
    water vapour changes, referred to as dynamical and thermodynamical
    components, respectively. However, the definition of these two components
    may differ among studies. At the time of the AR4, the robust
    changes of the difference between precipitation and evaporation
    (P – E) were interpreted as a wet-get-wetter and dry-get-drier type
    of response (Mitchell et al., 1987; Chou and Neelin, 2004; Held and
    Soden, 2006). The theoretical background, which is more relevant over
    oceans than over land, is that the lower-tropospheric water vapour
    increase with temperature enhances the moisture transported by
    the circulation. This leads to additional moisture convergence within
    the convergence zones and to additional moisture divergence in the
    descent zones, increasing the contrast in precipitation minus evaporation
    values between moisture convergence and divergence regions.
    A weakening of the tropical overturning circulation (see Section partially opposes this thermodynamic response (Chou and
    Neelin, 2004; Held and Soden, 2006; Vecchi and Soden, 2007; Chou
    et al., 2009; Seager et al., 2010; Allan, 2012; Bony et al., 2013). At the
    regional scale the dynamic response may be larger than the thermodynamic
    response, and this has been analyzed in more detail since
    the AR4 (Chou et al., 2009; Seager et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2010; Muller
    and O’Gorman, 2011; Chadwick et al., 2012; Scheff and Frierson, 2012;
    Bony et al., 2013; Ma and Xie, 2013). Over continents, this simple wet get-
    wetter and dry-get-drier type of response fails for some important
    regions such as the Amazon. At the global scale, the net water vapour
    transport from oceans to land increases, and therefore the average P –
    E over continents also increases (Liepert and Previdi, 2012).

  2. Robert Pollock says:

    Sun et al. looked at global precip over the last 70 years (1940-2009) and unexpectedly found a decrease in variance where, on average, “the dry became wetter while wet became drier.”
    Changes in the variability of global land precipitation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>