Today, twenty-four UK learned and professional societies express their joint views on the risks of climate change and the opportunities for innovation to address those risks.
The signatories include societies of physical scientists, engineers, medical scientists, social scientists & artists, amongst others. This is the first time such a broad range of professional bodies have issued such a unanimous text.
The scientific evidence is now overwhelming that the climate is warming and that human activity is largely responsible for this change through emissions of greenhouse gases.
Governments will meet in Paris in November and December this year to negotiate a legally binding and universal agreement on tackling climate change. Any international policy response to climate change must be rooted in the latest scientific evidence. This indicates that if we are to have a reasonable chance of limiting global warming in this century to 2°C relative to the pre-industrial period, we must transition to a zero-carbon world1 by early in the second half of the century.
To achieve this transition, governments should demonstrate leadership by recognising the risks climate change poses, embracing appropriate policy and technological responses, and seizing the opportunities of low-carbon and climate-resilient growth.
Risks. Climate change poses risks to people and ecosystems by exacerbating existing economic, environmental, geopolitical, health and societal threats, and generating new ones. These risks increase disproportionately as the temperature
increases. Many systems are already at risk from climate change. A rise of 2°C above pre-industrial levels would lead to further increased risk from extreme weather and would place more ecosystems and cultures in significant danger. At or above 4°C, the risks include substantial species extinction, global and regional food insecurity, and fundamental changes to human activities that today are taken for granted.
Responses. Responding to the challenge will require deploying the full breadth of human talent and invention. Creative policy interventions and novel technological solutions need to be fostered and applied. This will require a sustained
commitment to research, development, entrepreneurship, education, public engagement, training and skills.
Opportunities. While the threats posed by climate change are far-reaching, the ways in which we tackle them can be a source of great opportunity. There exists vast potential for innovation, for example in low-carbon technologies.
Capturing this potential quickly and effectively will drive economic progress. There are also significant additional benefits available from climate mitigation and adaptation actions, including food, energy and water security, air quality, health improvements, and safeguarding the services that ecosystems provide.
Actions need to be taken now, by governments, individuals, businesses, local communities and public institutions, if we are to tackle this global challenge, deliver the required cuts in emissions, and take maximum advantage of the available opportunities and additional benefits.
1 Net zero global carbon dioxide emissions.
Academy of Medical Sciences
Academy of Social Sciences
British Ecological Society
Challenger Society for Marine Science
Institution of Civil Engineers
Institute of Physics
Institution of Chemical Engineers
Institution of Environmental Sciences
Learned Society of Wales
London Mathematical Society
Royal Astronomical Society
Royal Economic Society
Royal Geographical Society
Royal Meteorological Society
Royal Society of Arts
Royal Society of Chemistry
Royal Society of Edinburgh
Society for General Microbiology
Society of Biology
Zoological Society of London
9 thoughts on “Climate Communiqué”
Although this blog normally focusses solely on discussing details of climate science, I felt this was important enough to share. This communique initiative was led by the Climate Science Communication Group of the Royal Meteorological Society, of which I am a member.
Ed did any of the above signatories actually poll their members views?
Good question – I don’t know the answer.
Good answer! To my mind the communique looks like a broad brush “appeal to authority” ahead of Paris, part and parcel of the politics of climate. In this political arena people tend to adopt “entrenched” positions in what is a war of attrition, meanwhile I’m wandering around in no man’s land.
I’m not lost however, there is a beacon of analysis to be found:
“This communique initiative was led by the Climate Science Communication Group of the Royal Meteorological Society, of which I am a member”.
So the Climate Science Communication Group of the Royal Meteorological Society communicated the risks associated with man-made climate change to these signatories (among them, the Learned Society of Wales, Royal Society of Edinburgh; Society for General Microbiology; Society of Biology; Zoological Society of London; Royal Society of Arts; Academies of Medical Sciences & Social Sciences, Royal Economic Society) and they (or their heads) communicated this communique to policy makers and the populace in general? Makes sense – politically.
No Jaime – the RMetS instigated the idea and the contents were discussed at length(!) amongst the many different societies.
So who actually engaged in these lengthy discussions Ed? The heads of the societies concerned or their members?
You would have to ask each society. RMetS discussions involved their Council I believe.