Climate Lab Book blog pages have a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
- The GWPF, Crok & Lewis, and Positioning Sceptics » Climate Resistance on Comments on the GWPF climate sensitivity report
- Ed Hawkins on Comments on the GWPF climate sensitivity report
- Jaime Jessop on Comments on the GWPF climate sensitivity report
- eadler2 on Comments on the GWPF climate sensitivity report
- Bill_W on Comments on the GWPF climate sensitivity report
- March 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (2)
- November 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (2)
Category Archives: GCMs
Guest post by Piers Forster, with comments from Jonathan Gregory & Ed Hawkins Lewis & Crok have circulated a report, published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), criticising the assessment of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response … Continue reading
The recent global temperature hiatus has been explained by the IPCC AR5 as partly due to natural radiative forcings (solar & volcanic effects) and internal variability. Recently, other effects such as CFCs and biases in the observational coverage have also … Continue reading
The recent IPCC AR5 includes a discussion on the sources of uncertainty in climate projections (Fig. 11.8, section 220.127.116.11), which updates previous analyses using CMIP3 (temperature, precipitation) to the latest CMIP5 simulations. The dominant source of uncertainty depends on lead … Continue reading
The ‘signal’ of a warming climate is emerging against a background ‘noise’ of natural internal variability. Both the magnitude of the signal and the noise vary spatially and seasonally. As society and ecosystems tend to be somewhat adapted to natural … Continue reading
What are the possible regional temperature trends over the coming few decades? Globally, on average, there is expected to be a long-term warming, but this is not necessarily true for any particular location or period. What are the probabilities of … Continue reading
A very simple question for this short post: what length pause (trend < 0) in global mean surface temperature could be simulated in a warming climate?
The recent WMO press release on the climate of the 2001-2010 period highlighted that global temperature change was accelerating. Although this could be a misleading statement, should we even be expecting global temperature changes to be accelerating at present?
Climate information for the future is usually presented in the form of scenarios: plausible and consistent descriptions of future climate without probability information. This suffices for many purposes, but for the near term, say up to 2050, scenarios of emissions … Continue reading
Can past observations be used to help constrain future temperature projections? This question is particularly relevant given the last decade which has shown relatively less warming than expected.
Now that 2012 is over, it is time to update a comparison of simulations and observations of global mean temperatures.
A new analysis by Clara Deser and colleagues (accepted for Nature Climate Change), provides some fantastic visualisations of the crucial role of natural variability in how we will experience climate.
It is well known that the past decade or so has seen less global warming than might have been expected – but what is the cause? This is more of a discussion post, rather than any new analysis.
The Earth is a complex system of interacting components, such as the atmosphere and ocean, which produce a wide variety of natural variability. This natural variability ensures that the evolution of a particular region’s climate, e.g. that of Western Europe, … Continue reading
There has been some recent blog discussion on comparing observations and climate models consistently. Here is my effort at such a comparison using the CMIP5 models which are already available.
This might sound like a crazy idea, but bear with me. I mean, why not? We’ve got some pretty general computer models of the climate, all we have to do is change the sign of a couple of numbers.
The time at which the signal of climate change emerges from the ‘noise’ of natural climate variability (Time of Emergence, ToE) is a key variable for climate predictions and risk assessments.
It is well known that there is considerable uncertainty in the projected response of climate models to increases in radiative forcing. However, there is also considerable uncertainty in the model simulated internal variability.
Update (23/10/11): The full article has now been published in Nature Climate Change Climate projections (such as from the IPCC) usually consider the question of “what will happen to our future climate”. But, this question may be more informative if … Continue reading
There has been much discussion recently on whether GCMs participating in intercomparisons, such as CMIP3 and CMIP5, are ‘independent’. But if they are not, how does this make a difference to the uncertainty in our projections for future climate?
Previous posts have discussed climate variability in general, and modelled decadal trends in temperature specifically. However, I should have considered decadal trends in observations as well, especially as there is a long temperature record available for the UK.
Climate models produce projections of changes in climate from the present day, but these projections have a range, or spread. A simple measure of the confidence in a forecast would be the signal-to-noise ratio, r, of the size of the … Continue reading
UPDATE (16/06/11) – the paper describing this work has now been published and highlighted. The potential for a rapid collapse in the strength of the Atlantic overturning circulation (AMOC) has long been recognised. The pioneering work of Stommel first suggested … Continue reading
After attending a recent workshop on Arctic predictability, I thought a brief discussion on sea-ice variability and potential predictability might be of interest.
Observations of Atlantic SSTs show significant multi-decadal variability since 1870 (see red line in figure 2 below), often termed the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation (AMO), though there is no clear evidence that it is really an ‘oscillation’.
Update 10/03/11 – Accepted article also online. Comments very welcome. Communicating the differences and links between climate variability and climate change is of growing importance, and I am currently writing an article for “Weather” on this.